WASHINGTON (AP) — On the evening before he was to argue a case before the Supreme Court years ago, Jeffrey Fisher broke his glasses. That left the very nearsighted lawyer with an unappealing choice. He could wear contacts and clearly see the justices but not his notes, or skip the contacts and see only his notes. It wasn’t hard to decide. “I couldn’t imagine doing argument without seeing their faces,” Fisher said. He won’t have a choice next month. Because of the coronavirus pandemic the high court is, for the first time in its 230-year history, holding arguments by telephone. Beyond not being able to see the justices’ nods, frowns and hand gestures, the teleconference arguments in 10 cases over six days present a range of challenges, attorneys said, but also opportunities. Roman Martinez, who will argue in a free speech case, said the lack of visual cues may change what sense is most important. “Maybe it will concentrate the mind on listening,” he said. The unprecedented decision to hold arguments by phone was an effort to help slow the spread of the virus. Most of the justices are at risk because of their age; six are over 65. And… Read full this story
- High Court Takes Cases On Cellphone Searches
- High Court To Hear Dispute About TV Over Internet
- New Zealand High Court clears Kim Dotcom extradition to the US
- Irish court hears case challenging transatlantic data transfers
- U.K. High Court Serves Injunction Over Twitter
- Department of Justice appeals New York court order in favor of Apple
- Justices indicate division on Texas abortion case
- CA high court: Home health aides can't sue Alzheimer's patients
- High Court's violent-game sales ruling: Why now?
- Report: Broadcasters Ask High Court to Shut Down Aereo TV Streaming Service
Blind justice: No visual cues in high court phone cases have 287 words, post on www.sfchronicle.com at April 28, 2020. This is cached page on Drudgereport. If you want remove this page, please contact us.